| To: | rfi@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto |
| From: | Facility 406 <facility_406@bruteforcedevelopment.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Nov 2023 16:44:57 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
On 11/6/2023 15:53, David Colburn wrote: Section 34 is, more correctly, silent on the matter. "34....Emergency communications, for example, are voluntary and are not required by our rules...the amateur service is not an emergency radio service." Appears the opposite of silent, with "the amateur service is not an emergency radio service", being rather definitive, unless I've missed something. Kurt _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto, Don Kirk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto, Jim Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto, David Colburn |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto, Don Kirk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |