Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances

To: TowerTalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Amateur Radio Tower Ordinances
From: Jack Brindle via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:53:19 -0600
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
You are in California. There is a state law that requires local governments to 
treat you quite reasonably. They cannot apply the PCS and commercial ordinances 
to ham radio antenna systems.
It is easy to look up the CA law on the internet. You might want to bring a 
copy with you to meet with the planning people.

By the way, the City of Campbell, in the Bay area, has no ordinance covering 
ham towers. They are quite happy not to have one, in fact. We tend to be 
excellent citizens.

73,
Jack, W6FB
Now in Louisiana, which also has a state version of the FCC PRB1 regulation.


> On Nov 22, 2023, at 5:38 PM, Bob K6ZZ <bob.selbrede@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I would only suggest a more reasonable ordinance if they insisted on applying 
> the PCS ordinance to Ham Radio. If they tell me there are no applicable 
> ordinances and give me a green light, I’m certainly not going to argue with 
> that logic!
> 
> Bob
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Nov 22, 2023, at 6:32 PM, Martin A. Flynn <maflynn@theflynn.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Actually it does - Do you want your 30 foot Rohn 25 tower bracketed to your 
>> house classified by the same rules as a cell / pcs  or Commercial two-way 
>> tower?
>> 
>>> On 11/22/2023 6:22 PM, Ron WV4P wrote:
>>> There are no rules for ham so you want them to create some ?
>>> That makes zero sense.
>>> 
>>> Ron, WV4P
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 5:00 PM Bob K6ZZ <bob.selbrede@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Are there any good examples out there that a municipality could adopt/copy
>>>> to create a reasonable ordnance for Ham Radio towers? My new QTH doesn’t
>>>> have anything specific for Ham Radio but they do for commercial towers and
>>>> Public Communications Services (PCS) towers. PCS is something specific in
>>>> FCC parlance and shouldn’t be applied to Amateur Radio IMHO. I’m hoping to
>>>> talk them into creating a simple reasonable ordinance based on successful
>>>> application elsewhere.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks, Bob K6ZZ
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>