RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] 80 meters RFI at N9CJT tracked down to an AT&T line (probably

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] 80 meters RFI at N9CJT tracked down to an AT&T line (probably VDSL)
From: "Dave (NK7Z)" <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2023 12:58:30 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Hi,
Link to 24 hour recording methods...

https://www.nk7z.net/sdr-rfi-survey-p1/

73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources

On 9/10/23 12:05, Jim Brown wrote:
I strongly disagree. The FIRST thing we should do in chasing noise is to determine whether it is impulse noise (mostly power line) or electronic noise, of which this is an example. Once that is determined, NK7Z's excellent method of 24 hour recordings revealing WHEN the noise is present lets us know WHEN to chase it. And when multiple sources are present, it can prevent us from getting confused.

I DO agree that trying to determine specific sources from their spectrum is a fool's errand.

73, Jim K9YC

On 9/10/2023 9:09 AM, Alan Higbie wrote:
Don’s approach in this case is a good example of first focusing on WHERE IT
IS.

Imagine how much time they saved by simply locating and sniffing out the
source.

Trying to determine WHAT IT WAS by looking at the SDR, how it sounded and
researching databases would have only added time and delayed elimination of
the RFI.


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>