Here is the list of the statements from the FCC Chair. I didn't see anything in
the titles that looked as if it might contain the statement that Randy read,
but maybe if he looks at the list, it will jog his memory. It would be
important to see that in context.
https://www.fcc.gov/about/leadership/jessica-rosenworcel#statements
Jessica Rosenworcel | Federal Communications
Commission<https://www.fcc.gov/about/leadership/jessica-rosenworcel#statements>
Federal Communications Commission Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel believes that
the future belongs to the connected. She works to promote greater opportunity,
accessibility, and affordability in our communications services in order to
ensure that all Americans get a fair shot at 21st century success.
www.fcc.gov
________________________________
From: RFI <rfi-bounces+w1rfi=arrl.org@contesting.com> on behalf of Michael
Carter <Mike.Carter@unh.edu>
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2022 3:09 PM
To: wx5l@arrl.net <wx5l@charter.net>; rfi@contesting.com <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System
No flames, Randy - just a request for the source
of the statement attributed to Ms. Rosenworcel,
the FCC chairperson. I can't believe any FCC
senior appointee would make a qualitative or
quantitative assessment of interference potential/severity of any
unintentional RF emitter.
Thanks in advance, and 73,
Mike, K8CN
________________________________
From: RFI <rfi-bounces+mike.carter=unh.edu@contesting.com> on behalf of
wx5l@charter.net <wx5l@charter.net>
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2022 2:56 PM
To: rfi@contesting.com <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University System. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content is safe.
There have been comments that the ARRL has the FCC's ear. Really do they?
Recently Jessica Rosenworcel , FCC chairwomen has made a statement about
issues with Solar Edge RFI and said that S-6 to S-9 is NOT harmful
interference. On what basis can she make that determination. Does she know
what an S unit is? Has she been advised from a technical support group to
make that comment?
The FCC's should not label harmful interference with an S-meters reference.
I would be confident to say of there would be s-6 interference to a fire
department, ambulance service or aircraft control tower that would not be
tolerated but as amateurs we must tolerate it in the eyes of the FCC.
Now let the flame throwers commence.
73,
Randy
WX5L
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.contesting.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frfi&data=05%7C01%7Cmike.carter%40unh.edu%7C8c813307d8814269428308dae1322fcb%7Cd6241893512d46dc8d2bbe47e25f5666%7C0%7C0%7C638069902910615128%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=mRSPgf5cwCtZa3qurAk42EJotNF3K0v4Iemg6KGmM5I%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|