Hi Ed,
My complaint is about both the lack of technical content, and the fact
that in what little does get printed, so much of it is wrong, and that
so many of the "cute" articles are based on dumb ideas or
misunderstandings of how stuff works.
73, Jim K9YC
On 12/21/2022 4:05 AM, Hare, Ed, W1RFI wrote:
have grown a LOT since the days in the 1960s when I saw QST as holding
tremendous articles that helped me learn. QST was just perfect for me
as an "average" ham back then. It still is. But Jim, you and I are not
average hams. We have grown to the point where the articles that were so
exciting to us when we were learning may interest us less now. If QST
had evolved to follow my progress in learning about amateur radio, it
would be way over the heads of the average reader we once were.
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|