On 12/20/2022 16:07, David Eckhardt wrote:
Don't feel bad, Kurt! I have had submissions rejected by ARRL for being
"too technical". These days, they just want pablum for publication.
If I were not a life member (thanks to my ex-wife many decades ago), I
would not pay annual dues. But, ..........having access to this RFI
site possibly makes it all worth it.
That was from another fellow, not me! I found it interesting, and was
passing it along.
However, along such lines, I've found several "articles", detailed
technical posts of mine made through forums such as this one, on the
ARRL webpage over the years. I understand anything tossed out in
public, is just that, but no decency to ask ("OK", but I would have
cleaned them up), or inform, I came across them years after the fact.
Same here on membership, tried a few times, dropped out for numerous
reasons, get the rag from someone else who's a member, but never reads
it for themselves.
Kurt
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|