|
1-3 of 3 messages
|
Page 1 of 1
|
|
M/S and M/2
|
Reply
|
|
by KB1FWN on April 22, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Some recent posts have asked for M/S and M/2 techniques. Just as a curiosity, does anyone have a very clear-cut definition that could show the difference between M/S and M/2?
|
| |
|
RE: M/S and M/2
|
Reply
|
|
by k9gy on April 24, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
M/S allows one signal to be CQing.
M/2 allows for two signals to be CQing.
Usually M/S allows the non-run station to work multipliers.
For best results, you'll need at least two stations for M/S and three stations for M/2. That will allow
for a station to be listening to non-run band in order to catch propagation changes etc.
M/S requires a fair amount of strategy and teamwork between operators. M/2 is closer to a M/M without all
the bands going at once. During the day 20/15 are going to be the bands since 10 is dying out now. During the evening, most likely 80/40 will take up most operating time with 160/20 in spots.
|
| |
|
RE: M/S and M/2
|
Reply
|
|
by DF7ZS on April 28, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I think M/S is more strategic and challenging. On M/2 there are more qso's to be done. There is a very nice article by Ken WM2C aount M/S that is worth to be looked up.
http://www.k2kw.com/ms_tips.html
73sss
Helmut
www.df7zs.de
|
| |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to this topic.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Check our help page for help using
Forums, or send questions, comments, or suggestions to the
Forums Manager.
|
