Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Truth, Fiction, or Fantasy?

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Truth, Fiction, or Fantasy?
From: Gene Smar via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Gene Smar <ersmar@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 19:40:24 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 TT:
     Recent studies have shown that 78.6% of statistics used in arguments today 
are made up on the spot.   Caveat Amateur.

73 deGene Smar  AD3F
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Edward Mccann via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Sent: Tue, Apr 26, 2022 2:44 pm
Subject: [TowerTalk] Truth, Fiction, or Fantasy?


This was recently posted on the internet by one of hamdom’s self appointed 
experts:

      “The Joe Hams of this world . . . where currently 60% of them seem to be 
quite happy with an EFHW antenna, 30% with an EFRW (Random Wire) antenna, and 
10% understand antenna technology.”

Is this anywhere near accurate?
Could it possibly be so?

Are 60% of the 779,545 US hams (467,727) and 60% of the 3.345 million 
World-wide hams (2 million) really “happy with” or “using” an EFHW?

Or another 30% (233,863 in the US and 1 million World-wide ) “happy with” or 
“using” an end-fed random wire?

That leaves only 334,569 who understand antenna technology!
Even with a ballot with room for write-in candidates!!

I must have missed the survey, and certainly wouldn’t have answered “yes” to 
the “are you happy with an end-fed half wave or random wire.”

Comments?

AG6CX






Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>