TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article
From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:34:19 +0100
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Barry, Jim,  

I have a pair of Rat Shack Minimus-7 (label says Realistic).
I don't know if it is from the same company you guys are referring to or
not.
The audio quality not bad.  Do you guys know it?  
How does it compare to the ones you are referring to?

BTW, having two identical speakers is great for comparing two radios.
I used these when comparing my Eagle and my K3.
I even swapped them after a couple of days, just to be sure it wasn't the
speaker.
The Eagle won on audio quality; wasn't even close.

73
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry N1EU
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:57 AM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] COMMUNICATIONS SPEAKERS Article

I couldn't agree more with Jim's comments.  If you want to tailor the sound,
do it in the electronics, not in the speaker.  The speaker should be an
accurate transducer.

And I love my little RCA/Radio Shack/Optimus speakers (Pro-X44AV)!

73,
Barry N1EU

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Jim Brown
<k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>wrote:

> On 2/26/2013 10:29 PM, Richards wrote:
>
>> YES - the author makes a good case for using something tailored to 
>> the task.
>>
>
>   Bullsh&t.  What is needed for good speech quality is nothing more or 
> less than a loudspeaker with flat response AND uniform coverage in the 
> speech range. And, because many (most?) ham rigs don't have high power 
> audio output stages, it needs to be fairly efficient. "Tailored to
speech?"
>  Horseh*t.  Nothing more or less than a decent small, accurate 
> loudspeaker that sounds the same over a fairly wide angle.
>
> Now, it so happens that Optimus is the "house brand" that Rat Shack 
> used in the 70s and 80s. They didn't make anything themselves, but 
> some of the small speakers they sold under the Optimus name were 
> pretty decent, and we used them a bit for making noise in rooms to do 
> acoustic testing.  But "optimized for speech?"  Zebrash&t.
>
> The reason that loudspeaker he likes sounds good on speech is that 
> it's a decent "flat" (natural) loudspeaker. .
>
> 73, Jim Brown K9YC
> Fellow, Audio Engineering Society
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.con
> testing.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>