TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Question for techies

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Question for techies
From: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:13:00 -0600
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
John, I saw 3 reviews and 2 of them said the NR was good.
I believe it is excellent.
Please send a link to the post you are talking about.

73
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of John Rippey
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 2:47 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Question for techies

I notice a comment by the first Eagle reviewer on eHam.net that the DNR
feature was unimpressive.

Similar comments have been made about the DNR feature in the Kenwood TS-590,
including it continues the (to me awful) SPAC
setup of the TS-570.

On the other hand, Icom's 7700 and 7600 seem to provide the best DNR
iteration so far, based on the comments I've seen. Yaesu, as usual, seems to
lag behind in the effectiveness of its various DNR iterations. So, why does
it seem so difficult for manufacturers (other than Icom) to get DNR right in
a DSP environmnent? Is it the cost of the hardware, firmware, software
engineers, or what?

73,

John, W3ULS
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>