Can we not stick to our own science and get off the “can’t trust anyone but
xxxx“ soapboxes?
If polluters can be verified, call them out. “What about….” never solves
anything.
Other than the cool light show when the Starlink train goes by, I know nothing
but because it’s visible, verification or lack thereof should be doable.
73,
Jim K4QPL
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 20, 2023, at 4:20 PM, VE3FH via RFI <rfi@contesting.com> wrote:
>
> Because he has the bad habit of making biased left-leaning political
> statements in a ham radio reflector. In past posts he cited CNN, NPR, NYT and
> the like as beacons of truth, that paints the picture :|
>
> 73,Julio VE3FH
> On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 03:30:48 p.m. EDT, Wes Stewart via RFI
> <rfi@contesting.com> wrote:
>
> Why do you give them a pass on medicine and climate? They don't know
> anything about those either.
> The "scientists" aren't much better, judging by the number of "peer-reviewed"
> papers that get retracted.
> Wes N7WS
>
> On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 11:22:50 AM MST, Jim Brown
> <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>
> Most of the press, even the best of them, are pretty ignorant of
> anything approaching science outside the world of medicine and climate.
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|