RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] Who is the "neighbor from hell?"

To: "nk7z@arrl.net" <dave@nk7z.net>, "w2ttt@arrl.net" <w2ttt@att.net>, "rfi@contesting.com" <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: [RFI] Who is the "neighbor from hell?"
From: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 10:58:11 +0000
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Hearing about the grower's shooting incident is a good point to pause to remind 
hams that they really need to use good judgment in opening discussions with 
neighbors.  You are the best judge of a local, neighborhood situation, so only 
you can know whether it is even safe to approach a particular neighbor.  
Although we, and the FCC, very much hope that most interference problems can be 
resolved directly by the parties involved, allowing the rules to work out as 
intended, there are exceptions to that expectation and some hams have asked 
ARRL to contact a neighbor on their behalf, even anonomously (the ham with the 
tower really won't be anonymous, though!)

What I like to say is that what happens when that first conversation takes 
place sets the tone for all that follows.  Remember, this person doesn't 
understand RF, or the FCC rules, but only sees that you are coming to them 
telling him that the device he just bought legally at Walgetzon is being 
operated in violation of some federal law he doesn't even understand.  Hams 
HAVE been known to initiate that conversation astride a very high horse, 
immediately creating a perceived threat.  We do have to be firm, but can be 
very neighborly in the process.

It gets worse.  By the time a case gets to ARRL, attempts at personal diplomacy 
have failed.  In many cases, the ham and neighbor have had some real knock-down 
arguments.  We are almost never told the truth that is behind all that, and we 
have cases where hams have told the electric-utility people to just get off 
their land and go find and fix the problem, and another where the ham was 
caught in a neighbor's back yard with test equipment, recorded on a 
home-security system.  In that latter case, the neighbor told the FCC that she 
was afraid for her safety, and did not feel she should be asked to work with 
the guy.  The list of cases like this goes on.

In other cases, amateurs have not given circumstances time to work out. They 
contact the neighbor and when noise isn't fixed in a few days, they contact the 
FCC.  By the time the case wends it way to us, the ham has filed a complaint 
with a Senator, or threatened the FCC and the neighbor with litigation.  Others 
go on a letter-writing campaign, sending weekly letters to everyone, or 
bombarding a utility or FCC with almost daily missives. One ham called the 
utility service center every morning and timed out the answering machine with a 
long recording of noise.  In every case, by thrashing about trying this and 
then that and then getting people working at cross purposes, the effect the ham 
thinks will happen if he can use anger to create outrage about how unfair this 
all is has the effect of monkey wrenching all that is in progress, and in a few 
cases, it has taken our staff using "personal diplomacy" to convince a utility, 
or the FCC, not to drop a case.

So, the morals of these stories is that hams to need to be careful, use good 
diplomacy skills and give processes a chance to work.  Did I tell you that 
we've got stories? Some would give you goosebumps! LOL!

Ed, W1RFI


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>