Why do we made our lives more difficult as they are?
If we realized there is problem with FCC and CEPT
Why don´t we work on it and try to change it to better
What is better ? I would say more activity, more contesting, more operators on
the air ...more fun.
All those restrictions are good for what ?
I´m here not to charge if rules were broken or not...just imagine to focus all
energy from here to
allow more activity over the world.
Going back to W2GD first post
"So the questions: Was the use of FS/KO1A for this ARRL DX CW operation legal
under US CEPT rules governing the use of a US issued call? If not a
legitimate use of his US call, should the operator have been awarded first
place over VP2V/AA7V in the results? If we agree use of an unauthorized
callsign took place, should the operation be assigned check log status or be
disqualified under ARRL DX rules? And one more question, should the contacts
made with FS/KO1A be given credit under the DXCC program if the callsign was in
fact unauthorized?"
I would say
The question should be: "what do we need to change to make operation like this
more "legal" and have more competition each ear. And how we need to change FCC
and CEPT rules if needed! "
73
Braco
E77DX
--
Emir Memic
EMS Solutions
Koehlergasse 12/3
1180 Vienna
Austria
+4369919227041
ATU53588808
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+emir.memic=emssolutions.at@contesting.com>
Im Auftrag von r-emails@n5ot.com
Gesendet: Montag, 21. August 2023 23:21
An: Cq Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Betreff: [CQ-Contest] R: ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice?
Matt, thanks for posting. Of course everyone in the conversation is interested
in what you have to say. I will try to keep my comments brief and on-topic.
Your posts convince me I am right by urging us to move the conversation away
from CEPT. It turns out CEPT is a big mud pit way out in the weeds. There is
no reason to talk about CEPT, when it is easier to talk about whether or not it
is okay for someone to use their FCC license the way you used yours.
That is easier and more sensible.
Your posts explain your opinion about what FCC rules mean. I appreciate your
sharing your opinion about it. I'm curious if you (Matt) or the contest
sponsor (ARRL), have actually asked the FCC what they think, or if you are
guessing at the answer. That should determine if your score should stand or if
your operation was in violation of the rules of your FCC license.
To clarify, W5OV did say "We consulted with the FCC on this specific matter"
but the specific matter he is talking about (CEPT) is not the one I am asking
about here (FCC License). CEPT is not the question. I get it they are
intertwined, but at the end of the day, the FCC should be able to say YES it
was within FCC rules for Matt to use his USA license the way he did -or- NO it
was not. It sounds like it's possible the FCC said something like "it's CEPT
there is nothing we can do" but of course I could be wrong which is why I am
asking the guy who had the conversastion. Bob, if you will clarify that the
FCC specifically said that what Matt did is allowed under FCC rules, I feel
sure the issue will end and everyone will be satisfied. Thank you for
graciously accepting doubt in a respectful and courteous forum.
I totally understand that maybe FCC never considered this question and did not
have an answer. Oops. We are all human, after all. That will just show us
(me, you, ARRL, FCC) where we need to improve.
Matt, thank you again for weighing in.
73 - Mark N5OT
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|