CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots

To: "r-emails@n5ot.com" <r-emails@n5ot.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots
From: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: ktfrog007@aol.com
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 13:39:48 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Data?  I believe he's referring to the results of the contest, generally.

73,
Ken, AB1J


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark - N5OT <r-emails@n5ot.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Fri, Nov 5, 2021 12:52 pm
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Spoofed Self spots

> ... the scoring rules heavily weighted to those around the Atlantic 
basin, make CQWW a complete turnoff for most of us living elsewhere.

Easy, big boy.  I don't live around the Atlantic basin, yet you don't 
speak for me.  That broad brush is not helpful.  Do you have data?

73 - Mark N5OT


On 11/4/2021 1:55 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On 11/4/2021 8:19 AM, Hans Brakob wrote:
>> Mike, the days when you actually COPY something are long past for CQWW.
>
> CQWW is the dumbest large contest going -- all you have to copy is the 
> call for most QSOs, and if you're assisted, you don't even have to 
> copy that! That, combined with the scoring rules heavily weighted to 
> those around the Atlantic basin, make CQWW a complete turnoff for most 
> of us living elsewhere.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> Santa Cruz, CA
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>