CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending Call getting worse?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending Call getting worse?
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 22:18:15 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I like the idea,

BUT......

Does anyone get busted for not doing it? I worked many LOUD and fast running stations during SS a few weeks ago, and they did not send their call in the exchange all the time. So question,,, what should happen to them?

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 11/26/2013 4:47 PM, Cqtestk4xs@aol.com wrote:
The concept of sending your call works for at least two major
contests...Sprint and SS.
K4XS In a message dated 11/26/2013 7:06:42 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
ku7y.cw@gmail.com writes:

I think  the simple cure is to require the call sign to be part of the
exchange.

That should also be easy to enforce.

OK, back in  my hole,

Ron, KU7Y
CWOps #1211
Northern California Contest  Club
Arizona Outlaws Contest Club
Silver Springs,  NV
ku7y@qsl.net
http://www.hatpinsandmore.com
KX3 #0062
DM09ji

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing  list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>