eHam Logo

Community
 Home
 eHam.net Home
 Articles & Stories
 Contesting Wiki
 Speakout
 Strays
 Survey
 My Profile

Resources
 This Week's Contests
 Classified Ads
 Contest Links
 Product Reviews



Contest Lists
 3830
 CQ-Contest
 CT-User
 NA-User
 SD-User
 TRLog
 VHFcontesting
 WriteLog

Other Lists
 Amps
 AntennaWare
 Propagation
 RFI
 RTTY
 TenTec
 TopBand
 TowerTalk
 Yaesu

 Mailing List FAQs


Site Information
 About This Site
 Contesting.com Team

Contesting Online Survey

Survey Question Current Survey Question

Recently the RDXC committee reclassified P3F to high power from low power without publicly providing strong evidence that any infraction had occurred. They concluded was that the contestant was running HP on 80/40m but not full-time, just 10 minutes here and there without any convincing evidence. It appears they used the RBN as their source of information. Should the RXDC contest have to publicly provide convincing evidence before reclassifying a station from LP to HP?

Recent Surveys

Randy, K5ZD, wrote a sidebar titled " Convergence and Change" in the 2015 CQWW CW printed results in CQ magazine. He wrote that the "convergence of personal computers, Internet access, DX clusters, and CW Skimmer have changed the nature of CW contesting". He goes to say that it is "more difficult to police the line between the single operator working alone and those who are using the assistance of DX spotting." In light of this convergence and change is it time to recombine SO and SOA into a single category?
2016-05-28


What's your primary Software for HF Contests ? ( no VHF/UHF ! )
2015-07-17


Are you ready the this year's winter contest season
2015-07-05


What ways have you found to be effective to attract newcomers to our hobby?
2015-04-28


What is your linear?
2015-02-09


View All Survey Questions

Have a good idea for a Contesting Online Survey question?
Enter your idea!


Thanks for voting! Your vote has been included in the results below.

Should the IARU HF World Championship have separate categories for High/Low/QRP power?
  Posted: Sep 01, 2003   (830 votes, 6 comments) by wa4pgm

Survey Results
Yes 80% (668)
No 8% (66)
Don't care 12% (96)

Survey Comments
RTTY
I would rather that they add digital mode to the contest.

Posted by AD6WL on August 24, 2003

IARU categories
First off, I am not opposed to having low power or QRP categories for this event.

Having been a regular participant in this contest for 20-some years, the simple fact is that this is, and always has been, a much larger event in Europe than it is in North America and elsewhere. Condx were not so good this year, so I worked a lot less EU. QSO totals were down. But some of the EU HQ totals would seem to indicate the activity was there.

I don't see a strong tie-in with overall activity and power levels.

73, Mike K9NW

Posted by K9NW on August 9, 2003

rules...
Add high power to NAQP while you guys are at it.

Blake N4GI

Posted by n4gi on August 6, 2003

IARU HF
Virtually ever other major HF contest includes High Power, Low Power and QRP competition so why not add these to IARU HF. I know this might mean a few more certificate winners, but what is wrong with that. I'm sure doing this will increase the activity level and the more the merrier!

73

Posted by W0ETC on August 4, 2003

Shack is way too hot in the summer to be turning on the amp. Save that for October!

Posted by KE9R on August 3, 2003

IARule Change
Adding separate categories for High/Low/QRP power will add value to the event, increase activity and result in more FUN! 73

Posted by Wo4o on August 3, 2003

To post a comment, you must be logged in.

If you are not a member, become one now!