Community
Home
eHam.net Home
Articles & Stories
Speakout
Strays
Survey
My Profile
Resources
This Week's Contests
Classified Ads
Contest Links
Product Reviews
Site Information
About This Site
Contesting.com Team
|
Contesting Online Survey
Survey Question
|
Current Survey Question
Do you plan to enter the CQ WW
DX Contest?
Recent Surveys
Recently the RDXC committee
reclassified P3F to
high
power from low power without
publicly
providing strong evidence
that any
infraction had occurred.
They
concluded was that the
contestant was
running HP on 80/40m but
not full-time, just 10
minutes here
and there without any
convincing
evidence. It appears they
used the RBN as their source
of information. Should the
RXDC
contest have
to publicly provide
convincing
evidence before
reclassifying a
station from LP to HP?
2021-10-27
Randy, K5ZD, wrote a sidebar
titled "
Convergence and Change" in
the 2015
CQWW CW printed results in
CQ
magazine. He wrote that the
"convergence of personal
computers,
Internet access,
DX clusters, and CW Skimmer
have
changed the nature of
CW contesting". He goes to
say that it
is "more difficult to police
the line
between the
single operator working
alone and
those who are using the
assistance of DX spotting."
In light of this convergence
and
change is it time to
recombine SO and
SOA into a single category?
2016-05-28
What's your primary Software
for HF Contests ? ( no VHF/UHF
! )
2015-07-17
Are you ready the this year's
winter
contest season
2015-07-05
What ways have you found to
be effective
to attract newcomers to our
hobby?
2015-04-28
View All Survey Questions
Have a good idea for a Contesting Online Survey question?
Enter your idea!
|
Thanks for voting! Your vote has been included in the results below.
You've just worked someone (any mode) and after the QSO, you realize you've screwed up his exchange. Generally, you...
  Posted: Feb 24, 2002
  (659 votes, 5 comments)
by N2MG
|
Survey Results
|
forget about it and log him as best you can.
|
7% (45)
|
go back and ask for a repeat.
|
12% (77)
|
go back and try to copy the exchange from his next QSO.
|
79% (523)
|
Other
|
2% (14)
|
|
|
Survey Comments
|
|
Copying the exchange *over the air*, *on the same band*, and *during the contest period* is fine with me. But getting it from an old log or the Callbook is not copying it (in the radio sense, that is!).
Posted by
KR0U
on March 13, 2002
|
Exchange screw up
|
I dear to say that I am sure I have copied the exchange correctly from the first approach.If not-I ask to repeat it before sending mine.But UBN statistics shows that it is never 100 % correct unfortunately...But it may seem annoying for other station if You are coming back after a while and asking for the number has been sent to You!So in extreme cases it is better try to listen to later Q's of this station to make sure .
73 !Ted,LY2OX
Posted by
ly2ox
on March 4, 2002
|
Exchange Amelioration
|
In swoop-n-pounce mode, its generally easy to work out what you are 'going' to get. During a quiet time it's easy to ask what was orignally sent if you hear the other guy. A quick search through previous contest logs may help as well. I have this set up on my MS Excel contest logger along with country and bearing lookup.
Posted by
vk2cz
on February 28, 2002
|
operating corrections
|
With the penalties for UBN's, etc., getting the exchange correct seems to be important. The paths which lead to a complete, correct exchange depend on whether one is running (ask for repeat) or doing H&P (pick it up from the next QSO).
I know I need far more corrections when I am running because of QRM, and QRP signals taking a fade in mid-exchange.
Posted by
k3yd
on February 26, 2002
|
Exchange screw up
|
Go back and do it right. It may cost you a big mult. if the log reviewers catch it and you don't.
73 Bob...WA6BOB
http://www.csun.edu/~skatz/wa6bob.html
Posted by
wa6bob
on February 25, 2002
|
|
To post a comment, you must be logged in.
If you are not a member, become one now!
|
|