Thanks for voting! Your vote has been included in the results below.
When operating a CW contest, you come upon a station sending very fast (QRQ) - faster than you are comfortable with. Generally, you...
  Posted: Jan 20, 2002
  (678 votes, 9 comments)
by N2MG
|
QRQ in Contests
|
I really admire the guys who can operate at 35+ wpm. But I question their strategy and wisdom when I hear them call "CQ TEST" 20 times in a row without an answer. If I could tell what they were sending, I'd answer. If ANYBODY could tell what they were sending, they would answer too. Guys! Maybe you're s2 here. Maybe you sound like you're under water because you're short path. Maybe my KAM thinks you sound more like G-TOR than CW. Maybe there are a hundred other guys thinking the same thing I am. Hey --- go with 35. But when it goes dry, why flog a dead horse? Instead of sending fruitlessly for 20 minutes at 35, why not try 25 and work some of us "bottom feeders"? Q's are Q's at ANY speed, right?
Posted by
NW7U
on February 19, 2002
|
QRQ on 160?
|
My pet peeve is the guys on 160 who run 100 watts to a wet noodle and believe they are as strong as you are with 1500 watts to a well-grounded full-sized vertical! I can comfortably copy >60 WPM but not when their signal is below my noise floor!
73, Bill W4ZV
Posted by
W4ZV
on February 1, 2002
|
Other
|
I chose "other." I've never run across a station sending faster
than I'm comfortable with :.)
Posted by
w2up
on January 29, 2002
|
QRQ Dependes
|
I can copy 35wpm comfortable, but worse is CW weigh. 20wpm with too long dash and fast dith is hard to copy for me. Byt the way, I always slow down when somebody calls me "QRS". It's a preasure send at comfortable speed to the other part. If he cannot read me, What am I doing so? It's not 2-WAY anymore. 73, Luc - PY8AZT
Posted by
py8azt
on January 29, 2002
|
Go with the flow
|
Generally my speed goes up and down depending on how many stations are calling. During heated "waves" of exchanges, if you call at the speed you can copy, I will slow down and send at that speed. If you call at MY speed, I will assume you can copy me at any speed. You always have the option to send "QRS" at any point!
Paul
WY7I
Posted by
wy7i
on January 26, 2002
|
CW
|
The need for speed...........CW's great.... (:>
Check this out:
http://www.csun.edu/~skatz/johnpage/cw.html
Posted by
wa6bob
on January 22, 2002
|
It can backfire
|
I do everything possible to have the guy's entire exchange (call and whatever else is needed) in my head before calling to work anybody, to prevent all the time wasted trying to figure it out later. I imagine it's happened to everyone that we work a DX station and miss some critical piece of data and then waste a lot of time trying to get it, which can include calling the guy a second time and being told we're a dupe -- thus, still missing the data!
Posted by
WB2WIK
on January 22, 2002
|
Fast is good
|
I like to go fast, so I guess I'm "one of them." :-)
Posted by
k2ua
on January 22, 2002
|
QRQ
|
If you are sending QRQ---receive an answer, send the exchange---then hear "AGN"---if your smart, you'll slow down, complete the "Q" and continue on.
If you answer QRQ and need to send "AGN" and the station won't slow down so you can get the exchange----move on---it's better for both stations.
Bud
W3IQ
Posted by
W3IQ
on January 22, 2002
|
|
To post a comment, you must be logged in.
If you are not a member, become one now!
|