eHam Logo

Community
 Home
 eHam.net Home
 Articles & Stories
 Contesting Wiki
 Speakout
 Strays
 Survey
 My Profile

Resources
 This Week's Contests
 Classified Ads
 Contest Links
 Product Reviews



Contest Lists
 3830
 CQ-Contest
 CT-User
 NA-User
 SD-User
 TRLog
 VHFcontesting
 WriteLog

Other Lists
 Amps
 AntennaWare
 Propagation
 RFI
 RTTY
 TenTec
 TopBand
 TowerTalk
 Yaesu

 Mailing List FAQs


Site Information
 About This Site
 Contesting.com Team

Contesting Online Survey

Survey Question Current Survey Question

Recently the RDXC committee reclassified P3F to high power from low power without publicly providing strong evidence that any infraction had occurred. They concluded was that the contestant was running HP on 80/40m but not full-time, just 10 minutes here and there without any convincing evidence. It appears they used the RBN as their source of information. Should the RXDC contest have to publicly provide convincing evidence before reclassifying a station from LP to HP?

Recent Surveys

Randy, K5ZD, wrote a sidebar titled " Convergence and Change" in the 2015 CQWW CW printed results in CQ magazine. He wrote that the "convergence of personal computers, Internet access, DX clusters, and CW Skimmer have changed the nature of CW contesting". He goes to say that it is "more difficult to police the line between the single operator working alone and those who are using the assistance of DX spotting." In light of this convergence and change is it time to recombine SO and SOA into a single category?
2016-05-28


What's your primary Software for HF Contests ? ( no VHF/UHF ! )
2015-07-17


Are you ready the this year's winter contest season
2015-07-05


What ways have you found to be effective to attract newcomers to our hobby?
2015-04-28


What is your linear?
2015-02-09


View All Survey Questions

Have a good idea for a Contesting Online Survey question?
Enter your idea!


How were the CQWW CW condx compared to the CQWW SSB condx at your QTH?
  Posted: Nov 28, 2011   (74 votes, 2 comments) by VE5ZX

  Much better
  Better
  The same
  Worse
  Much Worse
  Don't know
  Don't care
    (74 votes, 2 comments)
Survey Results
Much better 15% (11)
Better 16% (12)
The same 15% (11)
Worse 35% (26)
Much Worse 3% (2)
Don't know 14% (10)
Don't care 3% (2)

Survey Comments
40 meters
40 meters during the CW portion was as good as I have ever seen it. Worked BY5CD for a new band country! I feel like a real contester/DXer now, having worked China on 40m. Heard 9M6NA both mornings but he couldn't hear me
:( Both nights the band was full of Eu stations that were easy to work. The other bands were in pretty good shape also.

73s John AA5JG

Posted by AA5JG on December 11, 2011

Lowband Conditions
I was one of the ops at the PJ2T Multi-Multi, with W8WTS and W0CG operating on the 160 and 15 meter bands.

Conditions were worse on 160, which is how I rate conditions for the contest!

Posted by K8ND on November 30, 2011

To post a comment, you must be logged in.

If you are not a member, become one now!