eHam Logo

 Home Home
 Articles & Stories
 Contesting Wiki
 My Profile

 This Week's Contests
 Classified Ads
 Contest Links
 Product Reviews

Contest Lists

Other Lists

 Mailing List FAQs

Site Information
 About This Site Team

Contesting Online Survey

Survey Question Current Survey Question

Recently the RDXC committee reclassified P3F to high power from low power without publicly providing strong evidence that any infraction had occurred. They concluded was that the contestant was running HP on 80/40m but not full-time, just 10 minutes here and there without any convincing evidence. It appears they used the RBN as their source of information. Should the RXDC contest have to publicly provide convincing evidence before reclassifying a station from LP to HP?

Recent Surveys

Randy, K5ZD, wrote a sidebar titled " Convergence and Change" in the 2015 CQWW CW printed results in CQ magazine. He wrote that the "convergence of personal computers, Internet access, DX clusters, and CW Skimmer have changed the nature of CW contesting". He goes to say that it is "more difficult to police the line between the single operator working alone and those who are using the assistance of DX spotting." In light of this convergence and change is it time to recombine SO and SOA into a single category?

What's your primary Software for HF Contests ? ( no VHF/UHF ! )

Are you ready the this year's winter contest season

What ways have you found to be effective to attract newcomers to our hobby?

What is your linear?

View All Survey Questions

Have a good idea for a Contesting Online Survey question?
Enter your idea!

How were condx at your QTH for the CQ 160-Meter CW Contest?
  Posted: Feb 22, 2010   (97 votes, 3 comments) by VE5ZX

  Don't know
  Don't care
    (97 votes, 3 comments)
Survey Results
Excellent 13% (13)
Good 35% (34)
Average 20% (19)
Poor 12% (12)
Terrible 1% (1)
Don't know 14% (14)
Don't care 4% (4)

Survey Comments
Worked KL7
The band was actually pretty quiet here and I worked KL7RA for state number 48, now just need ND and ID.

73s John AA5JG

Posted by AA5JG on February 6, 2010

Good condx
Condx were good, not fantastic as compared to some over the last year. Noisy here in KY like W0UO. Lost beverage Saturday, had to work, and no time to put back up - otherwise would have been quieter to some degree.

Posted by w5mx on February 4, 2010

Condx were good, noisy both evenings, not as good to Europe as last year but, for me, better to JA. Score down only 10 percent from last year.


Posted by w0uo on February 1, 2010

To post a comment, you must be logged in.

If you are not a member, become one now!