eHam Logo

Community
 Home
 eHam.net Home
 Articles & Stories
 Contesting Wiki
 Speakout
 Strays
 Survey
 My Profile

Resources
 This Week's Contests
 Classified Ads
 Contest Links
 Product Reviews



Contest Lists
 3830
 CQ-Contest
 CT-User
 NA-User
 SD-User
 TRLog
 VHFcontesting
 WriteLog

Other Lists
 Amps
 AntennaWare
 Propagation
 RFI
 RTTY
 TenTec
 TopBand
 TowerTalk
 Yaesu

 Mailing List FAQs


Site Information
 About This Site
 Contesting.com Team

Contesting Online Survey

Survey Question Current Survey Question

Recently the RDXC committee reclassified P3F to high power from low power without publicly providing strong evidence that any infraction had occurred. They concluded was that the contestant was running HP on 80/40m but not full-time, just 10 minutes here and there without any convincing evidence. It appears they used the RBN as their source of information. Should the RXDC contest have to publicly provide convincing evidence before reclassifying a station from LP to HP?

Recent Surveys

Randy, K5ZD, wrote a sidebar titled " Convergence and Change" in the 2015 CQWW CW printed results in CQ magazine. He wrote that the "convergence of personal computers, Internet access, DX clusters, and CW Skimmer have changed the nature of CW contesting". He goes to say that it is "more difficult to police the line between the single operator working alone and those who are using the assistance of DX spotting." In light of this convergence and change is it time to recombine SO and SOA into a single category?
2016-05-28


What's your primary Software for HF Contests ? ( no VHF/UHF ! )
2015-07-17


Are you ready the this year's winter contest season
2015-07-05


What ways have you found to be effective to attract newcomers to our hobby?
2015-04-28


What is your linear?
2015-02-09


View All Survey Questions

Have a good idea for a Contesting Online Survey question?
Enter your idea!


How were condx at your QTH for the CQWW SSB?
  Posted: Nov 29, 2009   (171 votes, 8 comments) by VE5ZX

  Excellent
  Good
  Average
  Poor
  Bad
  Don't care
    (171 votes, 8 comments)
Survey Results
Excellent 9% (16)
Good 46% (78)
Average 26% (44)
Poor 13% (22)
Bad 2% (4)
Don't care 4% (7)

Survey Comments
My first CQWW
Hi there,

It was my first 48 hours contest, I never made it before, I usually made 4 or 6 hours, but never 48. That was my working condx:
160 M. Sloper
80 meters sloper
40 meters Rotatory Dipole
20 meters Optibeam OB-7 3
15 meters Optibeam OB-7-3
10 meters Optibeam OB-7-3
Ft-2000 and Win-test latest version.
Using a micro-keyer

I'm very happy, but I had a lot of QRM at home , my children was very noisy during the contest, and it was very difficult to hear low signal stations.

See you next year!!!
Rick EA4ZK

Posted by ea4zk on December 9, 2009

CQWW 2009 160m
First day I experienced very poor conditions on 160m,second day saw some improvement.
Overall,I eclipsed my winning 1st place finish by almost doubling my score in the contest.

Posted by ve3edy on November 14, 2009

Conditions on all bands.
Had a great contest.

73, PD2R
Member of the PI4DX contest crew.
www.pi4dx.com

Posted by PD2R on November 6, 2009

Conditions on 15m were excellent
More than 580 QSO's were made with the US only on 15 during the contest! Overal 1500 US stations were worked on different bands. Thank's to you all for giving us a call! We really enjoyed ourselfs. For the overal score, go to the "3830" link as OT2A

Posted by on6cc on October 31, 2009

CQWW BANDS
We had a sensational ten metre opening on both
days Asia and Europe KL7 was the closest north
american..33 countries and 16 Zones and on 15
we worked 86 countries and 29 Zones..

VK4TI@VK4KW

Posted by VK4TI on October 30, 2009

Condx at my QTH
15M 1st
40M 2nd
80M 3rd
20M 4th
10M 5th
12M nothing heard
17M nothing heard
160 nothing heard

Posted by KI4NCX on October 28, 2009

CQ WW SSB 09
First night 80m was hard going and 160m deadly, but still fun. Heavy local QRN with l o n g static crashes made LF all bar impossible the second night in ZL.

15m made up for it though and when the 10m light flickered on, we went hard at it.

73 Gary@ZM2M

Posted by ZL2iFB on October 26, 2009

Bands Actives CQWW
The bands more actived:
15meters=first
20meters=second
40meters=third
10meters=fourth
80meter=fifth

Other not good conditions: 160,12,30 meters

Posted by WP3DZ on October 26, 2009

To post a comment, you must be logged in.

If you are not a member, become one now!