eHam Logo

Community
 Home
 eHam.net Home
 Articles & Stories
 Contesting Wiki
 Speakout
 Strays
 Survey
 My Profile

Resources
 This Week's Contests
 Classified Ads
 Contest Links
 Product Reviews



Contest Lists
 3830
 CQ-Contest
 CT-User
 NA-User
 SD-User
 TRLog
 VHFcontesting
 WriteLog

Other Lists
 Amps
 AntennaWare
 Propagation
 RFI
 RTTY
 TenTec
 TopBand
 TowerTalk
 Yaesu

 Mailing List FAQs


Site Information
 About This Site
 Contesting.com Team

Contesting Online Survey

Survey Question Current Survey Question

Recently the RDXC committee reclassified P3F to high power from low power without publicly providing strong evidence that any infraction had occurred. They concluded was that the contestant was running HP on 80/40m but not full-time, just 10 minutes here and there without any convincing evidence. It appears they used the RBN as their source of information. Should the RXDC contest have to publicly provide convincing evidence before reclassifying a station from LP to HP?

Recent Surveys

Randy, K5ZD, wrote a sidebar titled " Convergence and Change" in the 2015 CQWW CW printed results in CQ magazine. He wrote that the "convergence of personal computers, Internet access, DX clusters, and CW Skimmer have changed the nature of CW contesting". He goes to say that it is "more difficult to police the line between the single operator working alone and those who are using the assistance of DX spotting." In light of this convergence and change is it time to recombine SO and SOA into a single category?
2016-05-28


What's your primary Software for HF Contests ? ( no VHF/UHF ! )
2015-07-17


Are you ready the this year's winter contest season
2015-07-05


What ways have you found to be effective to attract newcomers to our hobby?
2015-04-28


What is your linear?
2015-02-09


View All Survey Questions

Have a good idea for a Contesting Online Survey question?
Enter your idea!


How where contest conditions in this year's CQWW CW contest compared to last year at your QTH?
  Posted: Jan 01, 2009   (141 votes, 8 comments) by VE5ZX

  Much better
  Better
  The same
  Worse
  Much worse
  Don't care
    (141 votes, 8 comments)
Survey Results
Much better 6% (9)
Better 21% (29)
The same 21% (30)
Worse 35% (50)
Much worse 10% (14)
Don't care 6% (9)

Survey Comments
Propagation here was about the same. This
year the main problem was the big thunder
storm over our heads all weekend long.
Otherwise low bands would have been super.
Only 200 Qs on 80.
In 2007 not a single cloud over all South
America. That made the difference.
73, LU5DX

Posted by LU5DX on December 24, 2008

About the same!
Who cares about the conditions? It was fun. There were a lot of stations on.

Posted by oldfart13 on December 12, 2008

LF :-) HF:-(
Spot on G4ODV.

Flux now!

Posted by LB1GB on December 11, 2008

CQWW CW
Depends what frequencies you wanted.
LF was great. HF sucked.

Posted by g4odv on December 5, 2008

WW CONDX
Two words....they rocked!

Posted by k4xs on December 4, 2008

CQWW CW Conditions
Better this year on 80 and 40.
Worse this year on 15.

On the whole, about the same.

Posted by k6gep on December 1, 2008

WW Conditions
Don't care. The contest is the same weekend every year, conditions the same for everyone, so it doesn't matter anyway.

Posted by K5NX on December 1, 2008

CQWW CW Conditions
Conditions Friday evening not very good. But made up for it Saturday night & Sunday

Posted by N5ER on December 1, 2008

To post a comment, you must be logged in.

If you are not a member, become one now!