eHam Logo

Community
 Home
 eHam.net Home
 Articles & Stories
 Contesting Wiki
 Speakout
 Strays
 Survey
 My Profile

Resources
 This Week's Contests
 Classified Ads
 Contest Links
 Product Reviews



Contest Lists
 3830
 CQ-Contest
 CT-User
 NA-User
 SD-User
 TRLog
 VHFcontesting
 WriteLog

Other Lists
 Amps
 AntennaWare
 Propagation
 RFI
 RTTY
 TenTec
 TopBand
 TowerTalk
 Yaesu

 Mailing List FAQs


Site Information
 About This Site
 Contesting.com Team

Contesting Online Survey

Survey Question Recent Surveys

What is your guess? Do you think there will be sunspots for the CQWW SSB Oct 24-25?
2009-10-26


The new CQWW rules say "A competitor who wishes to be judged for a top score in their category must agree to a potential visitation at any time during the contest by an observer appointed by the CQ WW Contest committee. Failure of the entrant to respond to our correspondence or to allow an observer full access to the contest QTH may result in the competitor being removed from award eligibility for 3 years." What do you think about the new rule?
2009-10-02


A new category - Xtreme - has been added to the CQWW contest (see http://cqww.com/CQ_WW_Xtreme_Rules.pdf for details). The Xtreme category encourages the development of new technologies in amateur radio communications in general and contesting in particular. Entries in this category will be evaluated on two equally-weighted dimensions, score and innovation. Will you consider entering the Xtreme category?
2009-08-17


Have you seen the Contest Compendium wiki on this web site at http://wiki.contesting.com? If you haven't seen it then check it out and consider contributing to its construction.
2009-06-16


As of March 29, 2009, foreign broadcast stations were to cease operating on 40 meters between 7100 and 7200 KHz. During the WPX SSB contest did you notice a decrease in broadcast QRM between 7100 and 7200 KHZ?
2009-04-01


View All Survey Questions

Have a good idea for a Contesting Online Survey question?
Enter your idea!


How were condx at your QTH for the CQWW SSB?
  Posted: Oct 26, 2009   (150 votes, 7 comments) by VE5ZX

  Excellent
  Good
  Average
  Poor
  Bad
  Don't care
    (150 votes, 7 comments)
Survey Results
Excellent 10% (15)
Good 46% (69)
Average 27% (40)
Poor 11% (16)
Bad 2% (3)
Don't care 5% (7)

Survey Comments
CQWW 2009 160m
First day I experienced very poor conditions on 160m,second day saw some improvement.
Overall,I eclipsed my winning 1st place finish by almost doubling my score in the contest.

Posted by ve3edy on November 14, 2009

Conditions on all bands.
Had a great contest.

73, PD2R
Member of the PI4DX contest crew.
www.pi4dx.com

Posted by PD2R on November 6, 2009

Conditions on 15m were excellent
More than 580 QSO's were made with the US only on 15 during the contest! Overal 1500 US stations were worked on different bands. Thank's to you all for giving us a call! We really enjoyed ourselfs. For the overal score, go to the "3830" link as OT2A

Posted by on6cc on October 31, 2009

CQWW BANDS
We had a sensational ten metre opening on both
days Asia and Europe KL7 was the closest north
american..33 countries and 16 Zones and on 15
we worked 86 countries and 29 Zones..

VK4TI@VK4KW

Posted by VK4TI on October 30, 2009

Condx at my QTH
15M 1st
40M 2nd
80M 3rd
20M 4th
10M 5th
12M nothing heard
17M nothing heard
160 nothing heard

Posted by KI4NCX on October 28, 2009

CQ WW SSB 09
First night 80m was hard going and 160m deadly, but still fun. Heavy local QRN with l o n g static crashes made LF all bar impossible the second night in ZL.

15m made up for it though and when the 10m light flickered on, we went hard at it.

73 Gary@ZM2M

Posted by ZL2iFB on October 26, 2009

Bands Actives CQWW
The bands more actived:
15meters=first
20meters=second
40meters=third
10meters=fourth
80meter=fifth

Other not good conditions: 160,12,30 meters

Posted by WP3DZ on October 26, 2009

To post a comment, you must be logged in.

If you are not a member, become one now!