Speak Out: A post-contest accuracy report for cluster spotting?
Operating with spotting assistance is not for everyone, but for those who use it, what do you think about there being a published "accuracy" report for spots made during contests?
33 opinions on this subject.
Enter your opinion at the bottom of this page.
[Speak Out Home Page]
k3yd on 2007-03-13
A private "busted call" report would be interesting for those who think they're doing pretty well.
I think the reaction to a public list would be a significant reduction of spotting especially by those high on the "busted call" list. Since every spot report reflects some activity on a specific or approximate frequency, I say keep them coming.
K9NW on 2007-03-12
Why? Bad spots provide endless opportunity for late night musing over beers in hospitality suites. The real problem is ops who mindlessly jump all over the busted spots without even doing a mental reality check.
Anonymous on 2007-03-08
I think this would be quite interresting and would also make self spotters and such guys stand out mor obvious...
Enter your opinion about A post-contest accuracy report for cluster spotting?:
The opinions expressed within Contesting Online Speak Out are those of the
contributor, and not necessarily that of Contesting Online. Contesting Online
simply provides a forum for people to express their opinions on
various amateur radio contesting subjects of interest.
Do you have an idea for a Speak Out topic?
Email our Speak Out Manager
with your ideas.