eHam Logo

Community
 Home
 eHam.net Home
 Articles & Stories
 Speakout
 Strays
 Survey
 My Profile

Resources
 This Week's Contests
 Classified Ads
 Contest Links
 Product Reviews




Site Information
 About This Site
 Contesting.com Team


[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

ARRL Prepares to Manage Contest Changes

from ARRL
Website: www.arrl.org on October 18, 2000
View comments about this article!

Changes, Challenges Loom as 2000-2001 Contest Season Nears

NEWINGTON, CT, Oct 15, 2000--As the "contest season" approaches, ARRL Contest Branch Manager Dan Henderson, N1ND, is reminding ARRL contest participants of changes that become effective this year. His department also is gearing up to face the challenges that lie ahead as the Contest Branch starts implementing new log-handling methods.

ARRL Contest Branch Assistant Kathy Allison, KA1RWY, works through an incoming batch of contest entries and mail. [ARRL Photo]

Starting November 1, 2000, the ARRL standard file format for electronic submissions will be the Cabrillo format. ARRL November Sweepstakes will be the first operating event to fall under the new electronic logging standard. The CW weekend is November 4-6 and the SSB weekend is November 18-20 this year. (Rules appear in October QST, page 102.)

First announced more than a year ago, the Cabrillo format will result in electronic logs that adhere to a uniform standard that allows them to be processed more expediently. Henderson says the change to the new format will mean the Contest Branch can post the list of "Logs Received" for a given contest much sooner--once the non-electronic logs have been processed into the database.

"Approximately 80% of W/VE logs and 65% of DX logs arrive in electronic format," Henderson said. "The Cabrillo format will allow us to verify entries and initialize the database more efficiently, with fewer data entry errors."

Henderson says that one of the most common questions his department hears these days is, "Where do I buy this Cabrillo program?" He points out that Cabrillo--pronounced kuh-BREE-oh--is not a program but an electronic file format that specifies what information is contained in certain fields in the file document. "The major contest logging software programs spent much of the past year incorporating the Cabrillo format into their products," Henderson said. "If you're using a current version of one of those programs, you should have the ability to generate the Cabrillo file already."

Henderson said those using older software versions of contesting programs should check with the software manufacturer or distributor to get the latest version.

Details on the format appear in the "General Rules for all ARRL Contests" in the November 2000 issue of QST. Specifications for the Cabrillo file format also are available on-line. In addition to the file specifications, there are sample templates for various ARRL contests, a history of any modifications to the format, and some insight into the development of the Cabrillo file format.

Faced with more 18,000 contest entries during the 1999-2000 contest season, Henderson says his department's biggest task is routine data entry. "Right now all data must be entered by hand--a very time-consuming process," Henderson said. "It becomes a larger challenge due to the number of entries that are received for each contest that are incomplete or inaccurate."

Henderson says that Contest Branch staffers estimate that approximately one out of every five contest entries--electronic and paper--arrive incorrect or incomplete.

"The most common error is omitting required information that allow staff to properly code the entry, such as not listing a valid entry category, not listing power level, giving a state of residence or ARRL division instead of ARRL section for location," Henderson said. Another common problem is the submission of the wrong log files for the contest being entered.

ARRL Contest Branch Manager Dan Henderson, N1ND, proofs contest-related material prior to publication in QST. [ARRL Photo]

Henderson said each inaccurate entry requires a significant amount of staff attention. "We employ a wide range of tactics to try and resolve the problems internally," he said. "For example, other competitors' logs may be searched to try to determine what the entrant sent for an exchange. If a claimed score does not agree with the claimed QSOs and multipliers, the log has to be searched to find the answer." Henderson says all of this must be done just to get the entry initialized into the contest database. "This occurs before any log checking of contacts takes place," he said.

Some problems are relatively easy to identify; others are more difficult. "When a problem can not be resolved in-house, we attempt to contact the participant to clarify the situation," Henderson said. "If the participant doesn't respond, then we revert to certain entry defaults to code the data."

Henderson hopes to use computer automation to reduce the time needed to score submitted contest logs. For example, to cut the time needed for initial data entry, the Contest Branch is developing a "robot reader" that will take information from the Cabrillo format header and initialize that entry into the database.

"It's important to remember that these changes are not a finished product but rather a work in progress," Henderson said. "There will be adjustments needed as the robot reader is used. As the needs arise, we will continue to work them out."

Henderson said non-electronic entries will continue to be done by hand. "We will still need to deal manually with electronic submissions that contain errors and problems," he said, "but we're optimistic that as we refine the process, we'll reach the ultimate end result--providing accurate results for our contests in a timely manner."

Henderson also reminds contest participants that with the addition of West Central Florida this past January there now are 80 ARRL/RAC sections. "If you log by hand, please obtain current submission forms--an SASE with a note to the Contest Branch will do the trick," he said. "With great band conditions, we can all look forward to an outstanding contest season!"

Henderson says his department is always open for questions and comments about the ARRL Contest Program. Address them to Dan Henderson, N1ND, 860-594-0232 or [email protected] or by US Mail to ARRL Contest Branch, 225 Main St, Newington CT 06111.


Member Comments: Add A Comment
Cabrillo format implementation Reply
by n9rv on October 19, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
I am grateful to the ARRL for sponsoring and reporting
in QST a large number of major league contests. However,
I think that the League is making a mistake in its
agressive implementation of the Cabrillo standard to
contest log submissions.

I am very much in favor of making things easier for log
checkers, but not at the expense of reducing activity
in the contest itself.

This decision by the League (which, to give them credit,
was announced a long time ago) follows other recent changes
in some major contests that have required hams to
repeatedly update their contest software. This is a
trivial matter for serious competitors, but a larger
obstacle for casual participants.

My advice to the ARRL would have been to phase-in Cabrillo much, much more gradually. The real-world of casual
contest participants is not as state of the art as software writers would like it to be.

- Pat
N9RV
 
ARRL Prepares to Manage Contest Changes Reply
by K9NW on October 21, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
I have never seen anything, anywhere that says what happens to Joe Casualcontester when he submits an electronic log other than Cabrillo. Does he get an email asking him to resubmit his log? Is he told he must upgrade his software? Does he get DQ'ed? What if he has no particular interest in having the latest and greatest version of whatever program...he just gets on to hand out a couple hundred QSOs?

As Pat alluded to, this is S.O.P for the serious competitor. What about the other 75% of the participants?

For the record, I'm FOR the Cabrillo standard.

73, Mike K9NW
 
ARRL Prepares to Manage Contest Changes Reply
by KD1R on October 30, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
Lets not get in an uproar over this one guys...

No one has taken away the ability to send in Non-Cabrillo format. Case in point go the the CQ site and check out the posting requirments for the ww's. Plenty of latitude is allowed. Just as ARRL has announced. Or did I miss something in my reading of the full article.

One last question how gradual are we talking here?
A year seems gradual to me, or are we talking several generations for full implmentation. I Don't think so.

Ralph Stetson, KD1R
a "Contest Dabbler" from VT.
 
ARRL Prepares to Manage Contest Changes Reply
by KC4HW on November 1, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
For the "Joe Casualcontester" and others not quite ready to take
the plunge and upgrade their contest software, there is another
option. Bruce WT4I has created a tools that will convert just
about any column based ASCII log into the Cabrillo format.

Check out WT4I's Contest Tools, including Cabrillo Converter at
www.WT4I.com
 
ARRL Prepares to Manage Contest Changes Reply
by k3nd on November 7, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
Redoing the ARRL DX Contest CW logs after the results were printed in QST was very unprofessional to say the least!! At first they said everyone had lost one mult per band due to error in software. Then when results were reposted many stations changed position in ranking due to, in some cases, hundreds of additional QSO's being added to each band !!! What gives ??? Where did these extra QSO's come from?? And for only certain stations!! Who do you have to know to get these extra QSO's added to your score??? They have to get it right before it goes into QST. This is not the first time this kind of BS has happenned. Lets get it right the first time !!!
 
ARRL Prepares to Manage Contest Changes Reply
by k3nd on November 7, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
Redoing the ARRL DX Contest CW logs after the results were printed in QST was very unprofessional to say the least!! At first they said everyone had lost one mult per band due to error in software. Then when results were reposted many stations changed position in ranking due to, in some cases, hundreds of additional QSO's being added to each band !!! What gives ??? Where did these extra QSO's come from?? And for only certain stations!! Who do you have to know to get these extra QSO's added to your score??? They have to get it right before it goes into QST. This is not the first time this kind of BS has happened. Lets get it right the first time !!!
 
RE: ARRL Prepares to Manage Contest Changes Reply
by KK7UZ on November 27, 2000 Mail this to a friend!
If I'm not mistaken, non-Cabrillo logs are used as check logs only in ARRL contests. If someone could confirm/refute this I'd be glad to know for certain.

As a computer programmer who works with data exchange standards on a day to day basis, I have a few minor quibbles with the designers of the Cabrillo standard on a technical basis, but it beats the living daylights out of no standard at all.

Dan, KK7UZ
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Other News Articles
The Spurious Emissions Band at Dayton (2017)
The Pin One Problem, Live at the Visalia Contest Dinner (2017)
RSGB ROtating LOcators Contests
Maine 2 Meter FM Simplex Challenge
New contest: UKEICC