Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS (not exactly towers, but HF)

from [Dan Maguire] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS (not exactly towers, but HF)
From: Dan Maguire <danac6la@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:23:10 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> 
Jim Brown wrote:

>>> The differences jump out at you when field strength for multiple mounting 
>>> heights are plotted with the same amplitude scale.

Like this:

https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?attachments/upload_2020-6-8_6-33-57-png.670446/

>From this recent qrz thread:

https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/single-ground-radial-wire-placed-beneath-a-dipole-how-effective-is-it.709471/page-6#post-5498150

Dan, AC6LA
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [TowerTalk] New Hy Gain T2X ?, Kim Elmore
Next by Date:  Re: [TowerTalk] New Hy Gain T2X ?, Robert Harmon
Previous by Thread:  Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS (not exactly towers, but HF), jimlux
Next by Thread:  Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS (not exactly towers, but HF), John Simmons
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]