Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] finding rf on coax

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] finding rf on coax
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 22:25:12 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On Mon,11/7/2016 6:23 PM, David Voit wrote:
I
have an end fed wire with a 9:1 balun with about 15 feet of coax to the
banun and 90 feet of wire with no counterpoise.

No counterpoise is your problem. RF current MUST have a return. If we don't provide a good return path, mother nature will find one, like the wiring in our home. ANY end fed wire without a counterpoise is only half of an antenna. A connection to earth is NOT a return -- the earth is big resistor! Indeed, a connection to earth does NOTHING useful for a transmit antenna.

However -- security products and systems are notorious for having TERRIBLE RF immunity. Virtually any wired security system is likely to have problems with RF, regardless of how it is radiated or conducted. And yes, problems like this CAN be the result of the antenna itself radiating -- that's what it's supposed to do -- but those devices SHOULD be built to reject RF.

For some practical ideas about counterpoises, check out the slides for a talk I did at Pacificon several years ago and for several ham clubs about how to get on 160M from small lots. It's mostly about vertical antennas and counterpoises. http://k9yc.com/160MPacificon.pdf

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>