Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: the future of antenna and tower inspection

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: the future of antenna and tower inspection
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:41:31 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 4/15/13 10:33 PM, Grant Saviers wrote:
piling on,

the leads/antenna could be small gauge with power sent via high
voltages/low current, since the motors could be PWM driven with the
onboard processor or a simple buck convertor..  Taking out the LiPo
battery saves weight too.  Any Maker's that have hacked one?   btw
having flown a MEMS gyro in a rocket, I don't think the MEMS gyros are
stable enough for long term unattended hover positioning, so periodic
radio position control would probably be needed, or maybe a GPS lock.



I think optical station keeping would be easiest. Most of these things have a video camera looking down, so what you'd do is set up a colored target, and it would try to keep it centered.



Of course, a Kiteoon would be easier.

from TT, April 4th, 2003, WB6WIK writes
Hi Mirko,

I've paid about $200 for a kiteoon, locally. The 8-to-9 foot diameter WX balloons are usually about $30 each, so a kiteoon is definitely more expensive -- but, the kiteoon is reusable, whereas the latex WX balloons are not. Once they stretch from use and the He starts leaking through the latex (which it does, within about two days), the WX balloons are good for the garbage bin.
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>