[Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS

To:	<towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject:	[Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS
From:	w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen)
Date:	Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:30:12 -0500

> I got to  disagree with you on this one K4RV...
>
> No way is having a crank down and or tiltover better - I would go with the
> guyed tower over and over again - ESPECIALLY AFTER SEEING WHAT ANDREW DID!

Isn't a major point in owning a crank-up tower that the operator completely or 
at least partially nests the tower when not actively
operating?

-Paul, W9AC

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, Sherman Leifer [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, ag0n@arrl.net [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, Sain'T Tom [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, Jim White, K4OJ [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, Sain'T Tom [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, Sain'T Tom [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, Paul Christensen <= [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, Bill Hider (N3RR) [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, WYsixK [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, ag0n@arrl.net [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, <res0958z@verizon.net (Bill Otten) [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS - Not a panacea, Jim White, K4OJ [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS - Not a panacea, <res0958z@verizon.net (Bill Otten) [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS - Not a panacea, Steve Maki [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS - Not a panacea, Jim White, K4OJ [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS - Not a panacea, <res0958z@verizon.net (Bill Otten) [Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS - Not a panacea, Jim White, K4OJ

Previous by Date:	[Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, Sain'T Tom
Next by Date:	[Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, Chuck Mills
Previous by Thread:	[Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, Sain'T Tom
Next by Thread:	[Towertalk] CRANK UP TOWERS, Bill Hider (N3RR)
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]