Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Force12

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Force12
From: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 17:08:50 EDT
In a message dated 10/3/01 2:54:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, w2cs@ipass.net 
writes:
<< 
 I'm surprised Force 12 doesn't recommend you just replace their antenna with
 a dummy load. BW will be improved still further and cost will be kept to a
 minimum, although gain and F/B might suffer a tad :)
 
 Sounds like their BW  quote depends on there being enough loss in the
 feedline to achieve it.  Rather strange to say the least!
  
 Gary W2CS
 Apex, NC
  >>
Longer feedlines do make SWR look better.  There is another factor to look 
for also.  Does the frequency of the lowest SWR change also?  This can happen 
with some SWR bridges that aren't shielded enough and with Excessive RF Spill 
Over from a bum matching system.  With lack of proper isolation between the 
DE and feedline, the feedline length can affect the SWR in other than loss 
ways.  I have an all band vertical with that problem also.   With clean feed 
systems and good bridges I've found it takes a fair length of coax to reduce 
the SWR a noticeable amount and there is no change of the frequency of the 
lowest SWR.

I had identical bridges for CB that looked well shielded and they not only 
gave different channels of lowest SWR but certain ones had it change higher 
and then back as I cut the feedline in 6" increments over a 1/2 wave.  

What matching system does Force 12 use?  k7gco

List Sponsored by AN Wireless:  AN Wireless handles Rohn tower systems,
Trylon Titan towers, coax, hardline and more. Also check out our self
supporting towers up to 100 feet for under $1500!!  http://www.anwireless.com

-----
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>