Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Inverted U vs. toploaded short vertical

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Inverted U vs. toploaded short vertical
From: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net)
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 08:22:01 -0800
Help! I need to decide which configuration to use for 160 meters. I have 46
feet of pushup mast. I can attach this to a 20 foot 4X4 to get the base up
off the ground a foot or so over the roof of my house. I thought of either
adding a capacitance top hat to it of c. 10 feet diameter and adding
variable L in the base to get it to resonate on 160.

Option two is to go with an inverted U antenna. I don't have a second
support to make it an L so when looking at it from the street it would look
like a drooping inverted L, or a inverted U antenna. 46 feet vertical,
around 50 feet drooping horizonal (from the top of the 46 foot mast which is
attached to the 20 foot 4X4, out around 50 feet, and attaching to a 30 foot
pole) and then down from there.

Which would be more efficient?

Lane
Ku7i


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TowerTalk] Inverted U vs. toploaded short vertical, zeitler@ibm.net <=