Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] RE: Small tribander choice

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] RE: Small tribander choice
From: jimw@tstnet.com (Jim Worthington)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:25:25 -0400
I'm looking carefully at the C-3SS. Has anyone got data on the bandwidth.
The Force 12 Web page doesn't. I've sent for a brochure and emailed the same
question to Force 12.

- Jim AD4J

> 
> Hmmm.... It does have a good many more elements than one of 
> those trapped
> jobbies, but it is no more visually complex than a KT-34, in 
> my opinion at
> least.
> 
> You might also argue to her that it uses smaller diameter 
> tubing, has no
> big, blocky traps, etc.
> 
> If all else fails, take a look at the C-3S or even the C-3SS. 
>  The latter
> uses linearly-loaded elements on 20, so its maximum element 
> is only about
> 28 feet, I think - very comparable to the trapped tribanders. 
>  The C-3S and
> C-3SS have only a 12-foot boom, vs 18 for the C-3, and have one less
> element.  The only thing you give away is some SWR bandwidth on 20 and
> (maybe) .1 dB or so of gain.
> 
> 73,  Pete Smith N4ZR
> In wild, wonderful, fairly rare WEST Virginia
> 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>