That's not what antenna modelling tells us. For example an 80m
horizontal half-wave over average ground has over 7dB more loss at a
height of 10ft than it does at 50ft, even though in both cases the
maximum radiation is directly upwards. The difference is entirely down
to the increased ground losses suffered by the lower antenna.
At 10ft the antenna is 14% efficient and at 50ft it is 74% efficient.
Steve G3TXQ
On 18/07/2016 23:49, Carl Moreschi wrote:
I'm not saying it is good to have a low antenna, I'm just saying a
low dipole is efficient in terms of how much power it radiates, but is
is just in the wrong direction.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|