TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 07:31:24 -1000
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>


Noise Blanker (NB) is a classic function that goes way back to at least the early 1950's. What it does is look for a very sharp leading edge on noise and actually blank out audio for the duration of the steep noise spike.
This description is essentially correct. However there are a lot of variations in how it is done. The variations are in how the blanking trigger is obtained, the timing of the blanking and in where the signal chain the blanking is performed.

In the Ten-Tec Omni VI the noise spikes that trigger the blanking are detected before the first narrow filter and then the blanking of the signal (and noise) path occurs later in the IF. So yes the audio is blanked, but it is blanked by interrupting the IF signal path before the signal becomes audio.

In some systems a completely separate noise receiver (maybe with a separate antenna) is used to generate the blanking trigger. The blanking can occur anywhere from the antenna port to the headphone jack of the receiver being "noise blanked." There are good reasons to do it earlier in the signal path. The timing of the blanking can also be varied. How soon after the trigger does the blanking start, and how long does the blanking last. Another option is to use the AC mains as the trigger and synchronization of the blanking, which is effective when most of the noise is caused by the power distribution system.

DE N6KB

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>