You are looking at the wrong specs, James.
IMD is only part of the story.
Oops, I thought I was done with this.
Now I am.
73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K8JHR
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 7:04 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC
Bluff. Dare to Compare these transmitter spectral graphs by the ARRL...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/minirichards/14563417790/
These graphs are part of the ARRL 590 and Eagle product reviews,
respectively, and clearly show the TS-590 has a better spectral purity graph
than the Eagle. If this shows the Eagle is quiet, then it also shows the
590 is better yet.
Plenty of others? OK... then NAME THEM!
I don't mind being wrong... if you can actually show it, but so far, you got
nothing - except proof your nag is falling behind in the race.
;-)
------------------ JHR ----------------------
On 7/26/2014 12:49 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
> I'm done with that topic James.
> It's fact, not a bluff.
>
> Indeed, Rob did not test for broadband noise, but plenty of others
> have, and you continue to snuff their reports.
> What can I say?
>
> ___________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|