TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II
From: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:00:43 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
There have been several references recently to "AZNAC" (or is it "ANZAC"?)
receiver design.  Can someone please give a short review?  I tried google
but got no useful results.
Thanks and 73
Mike W2IY

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of ChasW3KC
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:13 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: [TenTec] Corsair vs Corsair II

Gary AB9M posted:
> The CORSAIR-II, with its PTO and AZNAC type receiver design, may be one of

> the finest, quietest analog receivers ever built, at least by Ten-Tec...

Did the original Corsair employ the "AZNAC" design?
I read that the original Corsair used 4 discrete Schottky diodes in the 
mixer and that the Corsair II used 4 monolithic Schottky diodes in the 
mixer.

Also, looking at the Sherwood Receiver Test Data on the web, I see it only 
lists data for the "Corsair" which would I would assume is the original 
version (?).

Any insight would be appreciated.  Thanks.

73 Chas W3KC 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>