TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Commercial CW License

To: geraldj@storm.weather.net,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Commercial CW License
From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 16:33:07 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I have my 2nd Class Radiotelegraph and as near as 
I could tell, it really is nothing but wall 
paper. because I got my Extra back when we had to 
sit the exams before the FCC, I didn't have to 
take the CW test.  I don't think that shipboard 
operators need to have any CW capability: it's 
all GMDSS now. I got the 2nd class simply because 
it was still available and I wanted it before the 
FCC decided to stop issuing them.  If I recall, 
the complete GMDSS licensing requires some time 
in a Coast Guard school for full certification.

Kim N5OP

At 01:21 PM 2/24/2007, you wrote:
>On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 09:42 -0700, JAMES HANLON 
>wrote: > This is a snip from this week's ARRL 
>Letter that will be of interest to those 
>considering a Commercial CW License. > > Jim, 
>W8KGI  > > FCC says no commercial credit for 
>prior military, ham radio, experience: > The FCC 
>has told a California radio amateur that it will 
>not waive a > commercial license application 
>rule on the basis of his Amateur Radio Morse > 
>code qualifications. Last April, Robert E. 
>Griffin, K6YR, of San Luis > Obispo, applied for 
>an FCC First Class Radiotelegraph Operator's 
>Certificate > -- known as a T1 license -- 
>requesting a waiver of §13.201(b)(1)(iv). 
>That > rule says T1 applicants must have a 
>year's experience "sending and receiving > 
>public correspondence by radiotelegraph at a 
>public coast station, a ship > station, or 
>both." Oh, that's simpler than it was 48 years 
>ago when I got my 2nd and ship's radar 
>endorsement. Then the experience had to be AT 
>SEA under the command of a holder of the first. 
>Coast station didn't count for that experience 
>(likely a free to the ship apprentice ship). 
>Though as I recall it only took 6 months, not a 
>year. I suppose ships sparks today though they 
>spend more time on a satellite circuit or fixing 
>computers and VCRs than on HF still are required 
>to have the first CW on US ships. Otherwise its 
>nothing but exclusive wall paper. I passed my 
>2nd (and 1st phone) 48 years ago, but the CW 
>license hasn't yet paid for its cost (and it was 
>free other than trolley fare to the examination 
>site and the day skipped from school). -- 73, 
>Jerry, K0CQ, All content copyright Dr. Gerald N. 
>Johnson, electrical engineer 
>_______________________________________________ 
>TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com 
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>