TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Corsair Questions

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>,<geraldj@ispwest.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair Questions
From: "GARY HUBER" <glhuber@msn.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:12:21 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
With respect to "split operation" and "dual VFO" capabilities, the Corsair II 
has the capability of DUAL RECEIVE when the optional 263 Remote VFO is 
installed. Paragon and OMNI V, VI, VI+ series XCVRs CANNOT DUAL RECEIVE, so a 
Corsair II and 263 Remote VFO provide a bit of an advantage for the serious 
DXer.

I kept my Corsair II and 263 when I bought my Paragon II and then when I 
replaced it with a OMNI VI+!

Best regards,
Gary - AB9M
CSM(r) G.L.Huber
9679 Heron Bay Road
Bloomington, Illinois 61704
(309)662-0604
www.csm-gh.com<http://www.csm-gh.com/>
csm-gh@www.csm-gh.com<mailto:csm-gh@www.csm-gh.com>
gary.huber@us.army.mil<mailto:gary.huber@us.army.mil>
wm@fifthinfantrydivision.com<mailto:wm@fifthinfantrydivision.com>
National Webmaster for The Society of the Fifth Division
www.societyofthefifthdivision.com<http://www.societyofthefifthdivision.com/>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: joel hallas<mailto:jrhallas@optonline.net> 
  To: geraldj@ispwest.com<mailto:geraldj@ispwest.com> ; Discussion of Ten-Tec 
Equipment<mailto:tentec@contesting.com> 
  Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 3:23 PM
  Subject: Re: [TenTec] Corsair Questions


  The reason I got rid of my Corsair (perhaps was that I found the RIT 
  range insufficient for serious DX "split" operation. I spent a lot of 
  time unsuccessfully looking for the extra VFO and finally traded it in 
  to T-T on a used Paragon, which has a dual VFO function built in.

  I have been very happy with the Paragon, however, the Corsair definately 
  has better near-in (inside 20 kHz) IMD and blocking dynamic range 
  performance. On the other side, the Paragon has very effective and 
  flexible frequency control in one box and adds general coverage 
  (including easy mod to allow 60 M transmit.\

  If I could have found an external VFO for the Corsair, I'd still be 
  using it as my main rig.

  So if split frequency opns are of interest, watch for one with the 
  external VFO!

  GL and 73, Joel

  Joel R. Hallas, W1ZR

  geraldj wrote:

  >On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 23:33 -0600, 
w6kip@kipwilliams.com<mailto:w6kip@kipwilliams.com> wrote:
  >I'm starting my hunt for a Corsair and hoping to find one in average
  >  
  >
  >>condition. I won't be concerned with cosmetics or the average wear and
  >>tear that comes with any 20+ year old radio. What would be considered a
  >>'fair market' range of prices? Was the Corsair produced and distributed in
  >>large number? Am I apt to find plenty to choose from?
  >>
  >>    
  >>
  >They are about and for sale on occasion. I have one I'm working on getting 
ready to
  >sell. A Corsair II with CW filter.
  >
  >  
  >
  >>I'm also trying to get the run down on their performance. Anything that
  >>makes them really stand out?
  >>
  >>    
  >>
  >The Corsair II uses Ulrich Rohde's favorite transformer (Anzac) circuit for 
RF stage and
  >first IF stage. His favorite for intermod performance. And they do work very 
well. It
  >has an "attenuator" which actually removes the RF stage so the input goes 
directly to
  >the double balanced diode ring mixer. All designed to give the best possible 
intermod
  >performance. The IFs are much like most other Tentecs with 9 MHz IF and a 
6.3 MHz IF for
  >passband tuning that really works well. It receives 18 MHz on the opposite 
sideband
  >otherwise it would have too many spurs on transmit.
  >
  >Any known issues to be aware of? What are the
  >  
  >
  >>differences between the Corsair and the Corsair II? Can I expect a II to
  >>cost more and is it worth it? As long as I'm asking all these questions,
  >>given the age and price range (under $450 I'm hoping), would I do better
  >>to look for another Ten-Tec model? Anybody owned or operated one of the
  >>Corsairs who'd care to offer their analysis?
  >>
  >>    
  >>
  >The passband tuning is very effective. I don't think the CW filter is 
needed. With the
  >two SSB filters and the pass band tuning you can get the response curve down 
to 100 Hz
  >or less. With the CW filter you can't do better but you can choose your 
preferred CW
  >receiving pitch.
  >
  >  
  >
  >>I appreciate the experience and knowledge of this group. Thanks in advance.
  >>
  >>Kip Williams W6KIP
  >>San Diego CA
  >>
  >>    
  >>
  >PTOs do wear. The frame may not hold the outer race exactly perpendicular to 
the shaft
  >and so the wear is different around that race. I have rebuilt my PTO, but I 
selectively
  >left out one thrust washer and at the low end of the band (where the spring 
loading is
  >least) it will wander a bit. I need to take it apart and put in that last 
washer to
  >preload things more.
  >
  >The PTO knob is very light. I like my tuning much better after I made a 2" 
diameter by
  >nearly inch thick solid aluminum knob to give some heft to the tuning.
  >
  >Lots of receivers will have lost some of the polished metal inserts from the 
knobs. Has
  >no effect on their performance.
  >
  >I won't sell my Corsair II for $450. That's below its value, I think.
  >
  >  
  >

  _______________________________________________
  TenTec mailing list
  TenTec@contesting.com<mailto:TenTec@contesting.com>
  
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>