Hi Ed,
N9DG gave a perfect summary of the differences between
the RX-320 and the Pegasus. Apart from those points, they
are identical. I use the RX320 as a 2nd receiver to my Pegasus,
using N4PY's software. I often forget which receiver is tuned
to which frequency, the receivers are so similar. The RX-320
is an excellent receiver.
73
Darrel, aa7fv .
>Message text written by INTERNET:tentec@contesting.com
>Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:10:16 -0600
>From: warhover <warhover@htc.net>
>Subject: [TenTec] RX-320
>To: tentec@contesting.com
>
>Hi All,
>
>I am considering purchasing an RX-320 to be used as a stand-alone
>receiver. I have a few questions, which I hope can be answered here:
>What is the difference between the RX-320 and the RX-320D?
>I have owned a Pegasus, and considered its receive audio to be
>excellent. Is the RX-320 comparable in receive audio?
>Does the RX-320 have provision for a remote encoder, such as the Griffin
>PowerMate?
>I would appreciate any other input that anyone deems pertinent.
>
>Tnx es 73,
>
>Ed KF9XY
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|