TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Re: NAR filter is OMNI-6

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re: NAR filter is OMNI-6
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 12:27:49 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Roy Koeppe wrote:

About,

"I have an Omni VI with 2.4K, 1.8K, 500 and 250hz filters but the NAR
slot
is empty. Can someone tell me what I would add to the NAR filter for CW
operation and why would I want to do this when the filters that are
already there seem to work real nice..."


If "the filters that are already there seem to work real nice" then perhaps you would not want to bother with the added expense for no improvement. When would there be an improvement? If you have a strong signal inside the bandpass of the stock 2.4 kHz bandwidth 9 MHz IF filter (but not in the narrower 6.3 MHz IF filter), that causes degradation of readability of a weaker signal inside your narrower 6.3 MHz IF filter, then a narrower (narrower than 2.4 kHz, not necessarily narrower than the filter in the 6.3 MHz IF) filter in the 9 MHz IF could make an improvement. This typically happens in contests or DX pileups.

The choice of which filter to use as your optional narrow 9 MHz IF filter is not quite as simple as just using the narrowest one you can get. Yes the narrowest one you can get will give you the best performance as far as picking out a weak signal next to a strong one, however you loose some flexibility that way. With a wider filter in the 9 MHz IF you can use to PBT to move the 6.3 MHz filter bandpass around within the 9 MHz filter bandpass. This allows you to select a signal without changing the pitch as would happen using the RIT or VFO. If the 9 MHz IF is really narrow, then the PBT has to be left in the position where both the 9 MHz and 6.3 MHz filter bandpasses coincide, or you get no signal through at all.

This is why it is nice to have more than one 9 MHz narrow option filter, and why I sorta wish I had an Omni VI + instead of a plain Omni VI. For tuning around the 2.4 kHz standard 9 MHz filter is a bit too wide, and the 500 Hz 9 MHz filter in my Omni VI is a bit too narrow. For digging a weak one out from between strong signals the 500 Hz narrow option 9 MHz IF filter is real good. I wish I had an inbetween option. No space for one in my radio. Having space for only one, I think the 500 Hz one is a good choice.

DE N6KB


_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>