TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] IF DSP vs. AF DSP

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] IF DSP vs. AF DSP
From: JC Quinn <kc4ee@sonet.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:36:47 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hello Dave:
I once owned a TS570dg and a Pegasus at the same time.  I did some A/B
comparisons between the two and I can tell you the Pegasus DSP is light
years ahead of the 570.  AFAIK the Pegasus and the Jupiter are the same.
73
Jim  kc4ee@sonet.net
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kreinberg, David" <DKreinberg@necinfrontia.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 9:03 AM
Subject: [TenTec] IF DSP vs. AF DSP


>
> Hello gang,
>
> Please excuse what might be a silly question. I have not owned or heard a
> rig that employs
> IF DSP. I am considering getting either a Jupiter or an Argo V with their
IF
> DSP filtering.
>
> I have used a Kenwood TS-570DG, which has AF DSP. I consider the AF DSP in
> that rig
> as OK - nothing great. On CW the DSP worked well and I enjoyed the comfort
> of using it in
> crowded band condx. On SSB, it was marginal at best. I can honestly say
that
> it very rarely
> helped with hearing the weak ones.
>
> I guess the big question is: Is IF DSP worth the extra $$ over the AF DSP
> rigs? Will one notice
> a great difference of one vs. the other?
>
> Many thanks.
>
> 73 de Dave, NR3E
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>