RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Old wives tail, or true?

To: Joe <nss@mwt.net>, rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Old wives tail, or true?
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 12:01:31 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
I did something similar when I owned a wood frame 2-flat on a residential lot in Chicago. I had an 80M dipole that was inductively loaded to fit between my skyhooks, and matched well on 40. I fed it with vintage Belden 75 ohm KW twinlead that I'd found years before at a hamfest. Tied both sides of the feedline together, so it became a tee vertical. It worked better that way on 80 than loading it as a dipole, because it wasn't very high (about 40 ft).

73, Jim K9YC

On 4/8/2021 8:34 AM, Joe wrote:
Correct Jim!

This is an old trick for those that have zero room for a 160 meter antenna. We often did this and loaded the whole shebang to be able to get on 160.

Joe WB9SBD

On 4/8/2021 12:36 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 4/7/2021 7:38 PM, Dave Cole wrote:
Is this true, and if so, why?

No. With the shield disconnected, the antenna is different -- if there's an effective choke at the top, it's now a long wire ending at the choke, because the shield and the center are capacity-coupled together. And if there's no choke at the top, it's a top-loaded long wire.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi



_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>