RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] RFI mitigation and prevention [was: led bulbs?]

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI mitigation and prevention [was: led bulbs?]
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 22:52:22 -0400
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Many are missing the point that regulations are often misplaced, or inadequately applied. In the case of RFI mitigation, the user is responsible for the individual case, but the regulations need to be enforced against the installer (for following recommended procedures) seller and manufacturer. If the seller is held accountable, they will cease purchasing from that manufacturer. If the manufacturer is held accountable for actual interference rather than just passing a set radiation limit under controlled conditions, they "might" become a bit more conscientious.

The toilet is a good example of regulations and last I read we were talking about "regulations", their implementation and effectiveness. There the onus is on the manufacturer, so why can't it be the same with RFI? As I read the regs, that ability to do so is there.

73

Roger (K8RI)


On 10/1/2016 Saturday 11:57 AM, Ed K0iL wrote:
I agree Mike.  The toilet water flush reference is way off topic.

The solar-nuclear reference (also off topic from LED bulbs) is a bit closer to root cause 
of the problem needing to replace shrinking power generation with supposedly clean 
renewables.  The more solar systems installed to do this, the more we'll face new RFI 
problems next to our ham stations.  We could "mitigate" this new RFI threat 
through normal means of time and expense normally mentioned here, or find other creative 
ways to avoid it's RFI growth no matter the politics.  It's all RFI mitigation or 
prevention in the end.

73, de ed -K0iL

-----Original Message-----
From: RFI [mailto:rfi-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Michael Coslo
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:33 PM
To: Rfi@contesting.com List
Subject: Re: [RFI] led bulbs?

I’m here for RFI mitigation, and not politics. Good day sir.

-73 de Mike N3LI -

On Sep 30, 2016, at 12:44 PM, Wes Stewart via RFI <rfi@contesting.com> wrote:

It's not shiny new, but I have one a hundred miles or so from me.  You would 
have to pave half of AZ with solar cells to equal its output.
The federal government has no business doing about 90% of what it does. Where 
in the Constitution does it mention how much water my toilet should use per 
flush?

From: Michael Coslo <mcoslo@comcast.net>

The problem of course, is that no one wants that shiny new nuc power plant in 
their backyard.
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>