RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Part 15 isn't enough..

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Part 15 isn't enough..
From: Cortland Richmond <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: ka5s@earthlink.net
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 22:32:16 -0400
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
On 9/28/2016 3:40 PM, charlie@thegallos.com wrote:
  Gives them an objective system of numbers to
work with

There's no need to add irrelevant regulations. First, the FCC has already SAID part 15 isn't enough, addressing "Parties responsible for equipment compliance":

§ 15.15 General technical requirements.
(c) Parties responsible for equipment compliance should note that the limits specified in this part will not prevent harmful interference under all circumstances. Since the operators of part 15 devices are required to cease operation should harmful interference occur to authorized users of the radio frequency spectrum, the parties responsible for equipment compliance are encouraged to employ the minimum field strength necessary for communications, to provide greater attenuation of unwanted emissions than required by these regulations, and to advise the user as to how to resolve
harmful interference problems (for example, see §15.105(b)).

§ 15.17 Susceptibility to interference.
(a) Parties responsible for equipment compliance are advised to consider the proximity and the high power of non-Government licensed radio stations, such as broadcast, amateur, land mobile, and non-geostationary mobile satellite feeder link earth stations, and of U.S. Government radio stations, which could include high-powered radar systems, when choosing operating frequencies during the design of their equipment so as to reduce the susceptibility for receiving harmful interference.

Second, there's no reason not to include in the purchase contract that the MANUFACTURER (as the Party responsible) warrants his equipment against causing harmful interference to radio or radio-frequency interference in accordance with FCC Part 15, section 15.105 (c). above

That means they have to 1) comply with the limits and 2) remedy the overage if it does occur, and add that to their product warranty in the customer instructions.

If you want to be really strict, you can require he also warrant the product against being interfered with per 15.17.


Cortland Richmond
KA5S










_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>