RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 100, Issue 20

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 100, Issue 20
From: jim feldman <mtnredhed@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 18:22:56 -0700
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 19:41:41 -0400
> From: "doc@kd4e.com" <doc@kd4e.com>
> Subject: [RFI] Didn't mobile phones originate in Ham radio?
> To: RFI List <rfi@contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <4DE036B5.7090308@kd4e.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> This drifts a wee-bit OT but given the technical-bent of list
> members I thought it might appeal to others as it did to me ...
>
> At the end of this article a scientist makes the following claim:
>
> 'Do you use a mobile phone? Some of that technology came about by black
> hole research'.
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110527/sc_afp/australiaastrophysicsscience
>
> Is he referring to something in the hardware?
>
> He's talking (broadly) about something that both GPS and CDMA (and it's
children) do and thats recover signals below the noise floor.  Some of that
tech came out of the radio astronomy field which is the way black holes are
researched for the most part.  He's trying to make the claim for pure
research funding benefiting the consumer domain.  Doesn't have any "ham"
reference.  Lets also not forget there were "mobile" phones prior to the
cell era (but were probably closer in tech to a 2M auto-patch) and were
hugely expensive.

jim
w6jmf
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>