Thanks, Jim, for posting this.
Every time I read what some partially-aware, erring journalist has to say about
this, I make it a point to write them politely and try and set them straight.
In this instance, the case made by the ARRL is being referred to as "claims".
After all the research, tests, measurements, case reports, impact reports, etc,
that's been done, you'd think Mr. Lamb could look into it himself on the ARRL
BPL section, and see that the case is not one of mere "claims", but of proven
_facts_. As Mr. Lamb is a "Science Writer", you'd think he'd have more sense.
In any case, think about putting your .02 in to these people when you hear the
subject discussed in a partially infomed fashion; like old Jack Webb used to
intone,
"Just the facts, m'am."
-Lin/KJ6EF
"Assume you are a Reporter; now, assume you are an idiot. But, I repeat
myself..."
-Unknown
=====================================================================
At 03:23 PM 08/14/2005, you wrote:
>FYI - For those that are interested, here is a link to the CS Monitor's
>article in today's issue re BPL. Apparently, BPL has cranked up its PR
>machine again.
>
>Web access may be as close as an electrical outlet
>With the right investments, Broadband over Power Lines (BPL) could
>catch on as an alternative to cable and DSL. By Gregory M. Lamb
>http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0815/p13s01-stct.html?s=hns
>
>
>73, Jim WA6PX
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>RFI mailing list
>RFI@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|