Maybe this release should be called CT version 10 to distinguish it as being
so different ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
To: Dave Hawes <n3rd@ix.netcom.com>; ct-user@contesting.com
<ct-user@contesting.com>
To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
Date: Thursday, February 26, 1998 19:52
Subject: [ct-user] Networking 9.34 or newer with 9.33 or older - DON'T!
>Dave N3RD makes an EXCELLENT point here at the end that I want to repeat so
>EVERYONE sees it again:
>
>At 04:02 AM 2/27/98 -0400, Dave Hawes wrote:
>
>>It should be noted that we stumbled across the fact that the latest
>>versions of CT are "network incompatible" with earlier versions in
>>that the times are not compatible. We didn't notice it during our
>>pre-contest checks, but had to revert from 9.35 to 9.27 on two of our
>>computers after about an hour into the contest. Then we had to go
>>around and Alt-F all the QSOs made by the 9.35 stations since they
>>were off by several hours.
>
>Because of the time changes in 9.34, you CAN NOT use 9.34 with any older
>version on a CT network!
>
>- Jim AD1C
>
>--
>Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> http://jjr.ne.mediaone.net/
>
>
>--
>Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
>WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ct/
>Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
--
Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ct/
Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
|