It was logged as zone 16. I presume that was what he sent. It sure wasn't a
state or province. Like I said, it sure is suspicious considering
conditions, the strength of his signal, and the time of day.
Doug
Free Climbing - The ultimate test of strength and technique.
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces+ve5ra=sasktel.net@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Michael Tope
Sent: January-30-22 2:46 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m Contest
What multiplier/zone did he send, Doug? That would clinch it in terms of
being a European call sign rather than a busted NA call. I've heard
allegations of monkey business in that region of certain stations using
out-of-region remotes and SDRs, but I don't know if they have ever been
substantiated.
73, Mike W4EF...............
On 1/30/2022 7:30 AM, Doug Renwick wrote:
> A UZ2 station called me on the second evening here. He was loud. I had to
> get him to repeat his call because I first believed a NA operator was
> mis-sending. EU stations were never heard here during this contest. Makes
me
> very suspicious that this UZ2 station was using a NA remote.
>
> Doug/VA5DX
>
> Free Climbing - The ultimate test of strength and technique.
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|