| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Receiver adjustments in CW contest conditions |
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Dec 2021 22:22:13 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 12/15/2021 2:52 PM, Hans Brakob wrote: Now consider if I used a sidetone of 800Hz (for an example). The same fellow fires up 100Hz away. Now the percentage of separation drops to 12.5% (from 33%) and my wetware will have a much more difficult time rejecting the interference. Yep. I too figured that out long ago, although my preferred sidetone is around 500 Hz. And the downside of a low sidetone is that it's too easy to miss slightly off-frequency callers on the low side. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Receiver adjustments in CW contest conditions, Kevan Nason |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Receiver adjustments in CW contest conditions, K3TN via CQ-Contest |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Receiver adjustments in CW contest conditions, John Geiger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Receiver adjustments in CW contest conditions, Tom Hellem |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |