CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW - Rules Changes Needed

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP CW - Rules Changes Needed
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 15:28:32 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
With respect Art, "wimps"?  I would have stopped operating on Sunday in SS years ago if it weren't for the Assisted category - tqalk

"Forecasting a totally non-radio ham radio" is no reason for opposing this small and simple change. I contend that giving Assisted ops their own space would lead to further growth in NAQP participation, which is good for us all.

Look at all the major contests that have added Assisted categories over the last 20 years.  Have any of them suffered?

I probably would have voted with my feet on the NAQPs years ago if it weren't for the NAQP Cup competition among clubs.


73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the new Reverse Beacon Network
web server at <http://beta.reversebeacon.net>.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.

On 8/8/2021 1:08 PM, Art Boyars wrote:
I don't exactly disagree with my friend N4ZR, but I'll offer some
countering thoughts.

- Top level, if enough people do not enjoy the contest, and participation
goes down, then the VOLUNTEER organizers might consider changing the
rule(s).  But this is "maybe should", and not "must".

- Rate is fun (for most of us), but there are other facets of contesting
that can be fun.  As a lower-tier station (and operator) with limited time
window for NAQP, I sometimes go to the "wrong" band to boost my multiplier
total.  Even in NAQP, I get a kick out of nabbing a rare one.  And I am
obsessed with the sweep in SS.  (Does anybody try for the
one-qso-per-Section sweep any more?  That would be 83 Sections in 83 QSOs
nowadays.  Now, THAT is slo-o-o-w!)  Do you remember that DXers used to
tune the band for hours looking for stations to work?

- I've been Assisted at some multi-op stations, and I realize that there
are some special skills involved.  But to me, they are so different from
the old "turn the big knob" way that I learned that the game is completely
different.  Maybe you like it better than I do.  I like it the way it is,
even though I know that skimmer enables my CW runs.

- It seems to me that the automatic spotting could grow to automatic
running, and with just a little bit more technology we could eliminate the
radio.  It's just a nuisance between the two ends of the QSO.  Somebody --
I think K1DG or K1AR) wrote a fantasy about this many years ago.  How far
away are we from its being reality?

- If you change NAQP, the next thing will be the wimps crying to "fix" SS
by allowing once-per-band QSOs.  If that happens, I think my age-driven
departure will be hastened.

73, Art K3KU
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>